The year before last, 38 economists signed in support of the government's "Lantau Tomorrow" plan, but the voices of the public's opposition have not stopped. It is an irrational choice to not pass the customs in all aspects. The author has also written a series of articles refuting the plausible arguments of this class of scholars. Borrowing from the viewpoint of the economist Zeng Guoping on November 12 in the Hong Kong Economic Journal, "Scholar Credibility Is Not Made in This Way"  , he said:
"The function of scholars or public intellectuals in society is to use their professional knowledge only. , to provide the public with an analysis of the photo background removing development of the situation, to remove some mistakes and prejudices, and it is an important force to fight against populism and suppress ignorance. To have this positive effect, scholars must have credibility. At least, they must admit their mistakes and change their views. explain." However, the 38 economists, including Wang Yujian and Lei Dingming, two representatives of the Chicago School and the "national teachers" of the Hong Kong government, did not have the courage to admit their mistakes, nor did they require scholars who submit to reason. , giving a minimum of attention. The government's desire to reclaim the land has not diminished. Recently, many people in the financial sector have been vigorously promoting the "Lantau Tomorrow" crowdfunding plan  .
Opportunity to eat big tea. Zeng Guoping pointed out that the selling point of these crowdfunding plans is that "everyone in Hong Kong has a share", and they are only talking about warrants. If "Lantau of Tomorrow" turns into a bloody white elephant in the end, the right to buy shares will be nothing. not worth. In fact, judging from the Hong Kong government's record of frequent and severe overruns in large-scale infrastructure projects in recent years, who would believe that "Lantau of Tomorrow" is not a pirate ship that coaxes you/you can't get away with it? Yao Songyan criticized last year  that the revenue estimate of "Lantau Tomorrow" was overly optimistic, three times the long-term demand for commercial space estimated by the Planning Department, which made people feel that the whole number was overstated. Moreover, the